<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UJS; RJS versus POJS; Prototype Stack versus JQuery Stack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/</link>
	<description>Bill Burcham's Launch Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnen Laibow-Koser</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marnen Laibow-Koser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are certainly other options for unobtrusive JS. I&#039;ve done a complex Ajax application with Mootools, unobtrusive-style coding, and PHP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certainly other options for unobtrusive JS. I&#8217;ve done a complex Ajax application with Mootools, unobtrusive-style coding, and PHP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am a rails developer, and i&#039;m not a fan of rjs. in fact, i started w/ ruby, then rails, then got tired of rjs and a lot of the mixing of xhtml, css, and javascript that is the out-of-the-box rails experience. i appreciate the &#039;shield rails programmers from any non-ruby/rails code&#039;, and they&#039;ve done a fantastic job w/ most of it. but, i just went ahead and learned js and use that exclusively. i will at minimum, use jquery for it&#039;s document.ready() and a lot of the features that libraries excel at: cross-browser issues. and at maximum, i love the chaining. 1 line to take care of what 10 lines of pojs does is hard to argue against.

plus, jquery.min is *tiny* compared to the :defaults that rails wants you to use. and you can choose to load only the plugins you want on a per-site basis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a rails developer, and i&#8217;m not a fan of rjs. in fact, i started w/ ruby, then rails, then got tired of rjs and a lot of the mixing of xhtml, css, and javascript that is the out-of-the-box rails experience. i appreciate the &#8216;shield rails programmers from any non-ruby/rails code&#8217;, and they&#8217;ve done a fantastic job w/ most of it. but, i just went ahead and learned js and use that exclusively. i will at minimum, use jquery for it&#8217;s document.ready() and a lot of the features that libraries excel at: cross-browser issues. and at maximum, i love the chaining. 1 line to take care of what 10 lines of pojs does is hard to argue against.</p>
<p>plus, jquery.min is *tiny* compared to the :defaults that rails wants you to use. and you can choose to load only the plugins you want on a per-site basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jQuery is definitely the way to go for me. RJS seems to be simply a stepping stone for programmers that are scared of javascript (i.e. they dont know it very well).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery is definitely the way to go for me. RJS seems to be simply a stepping stone for programmers that are scared of javascript (i.e. they dont know it very well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/08/17/ujs-rjs-versus-pojs-prototype-stack-versus-jquery-stack/#comment-360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a RoR developer so I cant give you any advice about your Ruby predicament.  I do, however, love jQuery.  You said one thing right - people who I respect are moving to jQuery.  I am think for good reason!  I am sure the Prototype will eventually emulate some of the things jQuery is doing to make life easier for us.  It is just how the game works - if a product is doing better than yours, you figure out why and you make your product do the same - or do it significantly better.  I dont know if Prototype can do it better.  Personally, I have already made the switch to jQuery about two months ago and it has changed the way I code.  Everything is prettier and makes more sense to read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a RoR developer so I cant give you any advice about your Ruby predicament.  I do, however, love jQuery.  You said one thing right &#8211; people who I respect are moving to jQuery.  I am think for good reason!  I am sure the Prototype will eventually emulate some of the things jQuery is doing to make life easier for us.  It is just how the game works &#8211; if a product is doing better than yours, you figure out why and you make your product do the same &#8211; or do it significantly better.  I dont know if Prototype can do it better.  Personally, I have already made the switch to jQuery about two months ago and it has changed the way I code.  Everything is prettier and makes more sense to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

