<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: :has_many Associations with Complex Joins (Kind of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://memerocket.com/2007/07/06/has_many-associations-with-complex-joins-kind-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/07/06/has_many-associations-with-complex-joins-kind-of/</link>
	<description>Bill Burcham's Launch Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/07/06/has_many-associations-with-complex-joins-kind-of/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/07/06/has_many-associations-with-complex-joins-kind-of/#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rails ticket &lt;a href=&#039;http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2840&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2840&lt;/a&gt; proposes a :distinct option for has_many. And a certain Ryan Carver weighs in in the comments with a proposal for adding support for :joins. From his comment:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve been using a custom read only has_many implementation I called &quot;knows_about&quot; for supporting these more complex associations.. because once you start doing joins it&#039;s really a different thing than has_many.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That read only part sure makes sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rails ticket <a href='http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2840' rel="nofollow">2840</a> proposes a :distinct option for has_many. And a certain Ryan Carver weighs in in the comments with a proposal for adding support for :joins. From his comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been using a custom read only has_many implementation I called &#8220;knows_about&#8221; for supporting these more complex associations.. because once you start doing joins it&#8217;s really a different thing than has_many.</p></blockquote>
<p>That read only part sure makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

