<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ID Proliferation Eradication Technique #1: Leverage page.select with page.insert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://memerocket.com/2007/07/05/id-proliferation-eradication-technique-1-leverage-pageselect-with-pageinsert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/07/05/id-proliferation-eradication-technique-1-leverage-pageselect-with-pageinsert/</link>
	<description>Bill Burcham's Launch Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Burcham&apos;s memeRocket :: UJS; RJS versus POJS; Prototype Stack versus JQuery Stack</title>
		<link>http://memerocket.com/2007/07/05/id-proliferation-eradication-technique-1-leverage-pageselect-with-pageinsert/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Burcham&apos;s memeRocket :: UJS; RJS versus POJS; Prototype Stack versus JQuery Stack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meme-rocket.com/2007/07/05/id-proliferation-eradication-technique-1-leverage-pageselect-with-pageinsert/#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] An RJS template generates JavaScript from Ruby code &#8212; but that Ruby API is insufficiently documented (in particular with regard to the scriptaculous effects) and insufficiently capable (e.g. there is no easy way to update DOM elements matching a CSS selector through that API). Essentially a guy can waste a lot of time trying to get RJS to work for anything but the simplest demos. So I lean toward plain-old JavaScript (POJS) instead. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An RJS template generates JavaScript from Ruby code &#8212; but that Ruby API is insufficiently documented (in particular with regard to the scriptaculous effects) and insufficiently capable (e.g. there is no easy way to update DOM elements matching a CSS selector through that API). Essentially a guy can waste a lot of time trying to get RJS to work for anything but the simplest demos. So I lean toward plain-old JavaScript (POJS) instead. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

